Thread:Shanethefilmmaker/@comment-397235-20140801024539/@comment-6052796-20140810144412

What's really funny about the Romero example though was that when he did Night, that wasn't really his intention, much of the political and social commentary was actually from critics that thought he was using political satire. Rather than protest George simply roled with it,  when he did Dawn and Day that's when he started intenitonally doing it.

When I mentioned the judge being the only politician I was merely stating that it's hard to have an opposing argument when potential opposers are either dead or in Vegas. The only other figure that seemed to have some sense with the exception of the main characters was a guy on the Vegas side. Before he was in Vegas he used to be a cop and during Underwood's Kangeroo Court sequence (Not much of a trial since he and the other two remaining in his Group are being executed on the spot.)  was one of the few sane people in Vegas.

I do get what you're saying that you'd rather have both sides and I agree with that. But if King's gonna rag on one side, it's pretty much his right to do it. The fact of the matter though is King believes that politics while stupid in their own right,(I don't wanna open that can of worms.) still effect the world around us. When a country, or a world is coming to an end the first thing even those that don't care for politics would say this "Somebody up there must have fucked up."